Jim, very well said. Kopin "sell the sizzle not the steak"

Stocks are mispriced all the time . That's why KOPN went fro +$4 to sub $2 . 

Fan's management style is to make every "win" seem like a huge deal i.e.. $100m potential . Sculley will rarely give a name . For example , instead of EMAN naming Intel in a PR they were referred to as a "US Chipmaker" . The F-35 has only been named by Sculley once that I remember . Instead he refers to it as "a multi-service, multi-country, fixed wing aircraft program."

Investors that don't have time to do deep DD and just want to hear buzzwords are the kind of investors that KOPN attracts . To see what is really happening with EMAN you have to do more investigative work which the average retail investor doesn't have time for . Many Analysts also won't spend that much time of a small cap .

A perfect example would be to compare KOPN's relationship with Goertek to EMAN's relationship with Flex .

2 pr's - Kopin Enters Into Strategic Relationship With Goertek Inc.and Kopin Completes Strategic Agreement with Goertek . How many other times has Fan dropped Goertek's name . Is it really that big a deal ? Goertek makes KOPN's Solos and might design in some of KOPN's products . Revenues from this 18 month relationship - $0 . But I'm sure it's $100 gazillion potential .

On EMAN & Flex . The only hint at a relationship was the PR that Eric Braddom of Flex became a EMAN Board member .